User talk:DhammaSeeker: Difference between revisions

From The Evanescence Reference
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:


::::Ahh - I just like a clean talk page. Mostly so I will be able to keep things straight as to what needs answering. --[[User:DhammaSeeker|DhammaSeeker]] 19:24, 23 January 2007 (PST)
::::Ahh - I just like a clean talk page. Mostly so I will be able to keep things straight as to what needs answering. --[[User:DhammaSeeker|DhammaSeeker]] 19:24, 23 January 2007 (PST)
Hey, There are two versions of an article about issue 3.0 of Automata Magazine.  The more recent one [[Automata Magazine]] is more descriptive and accurate (i know because i own a copy of the magazine) so could you please delete this inaccurate old one [[Automata Version 3.0]] --[[User:Never be good enough|Never Be Good Enough]]
----
----
*[[User_talk:DhammaSeeker/Archive | Archived Discussions]]
*[[User_talk:DhammaSeeker/Archive | Archived Discussions]]

Revision as of 16:19, 24 January 2007

Archive

A little thing...Your archived discussion was too small to be archived. Armando.O (talk|contribs) 17:58, 20 January 2007 (PST)

I'm going to sound stupid here, but what? --DhammaSeeker 11:41, 22 January 2007 (PST)

I mean, your talk page must have like 20 topics or be very long. (30-50 kbs) Armando.O (talk|contribs) 20:25, 22 January 2007 (PST)

I think Wikipedia or whoever elses rules besides Dhamma's don't apply here. Relax. --XERXES_II 7:49, 23 January 2007 (PST)

I was just a suggestion for Dhamma, not for you. Armando.O (talk|contribs) 11:21, 23 January 2007 (PST)

Ahh - I just like a clean talk page. Mostly so I will be able to keep things straight as to what needs answering. --DhammaSeeker 19:24, 23 January 2007 (PST)

Hey, There are two versions of an article about issue 3.0 of Automata Magazine. The more recent one Automata Magazine is more descriptive and accurate (i know because i own a copy of the magazine) so could you please delete this inaccurate old one Automata Version 3.0 --Never Be Good Enough