User talk:DhammaSeeker/Archive: Difference between revisions
DhammaSeeker (talk | contribs) (References) |
DhammaSeeker (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
== re: Archive == | |||
A little thing...Your archived discussion was too small to be archived. [[User:Eacz12|<font color="#666">Armando.O</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Eacz12|<font color="#666">talk</font>]]|[[Special:Contributions/Eacz12|<font color="#666">contribs</font>]])</sup> 17:58, 20 January 2007 (PST) | |||
:I'm going to sound stupid here, but what? --[[User:DhammaSeeker|DhammaSeeker]] 11:41, 22 January 2007 (PST) | |||
I mean, your talk page must have like 20 topics or be very long. (30-50 kbs) [[User:Eacz12|<font color="#666">Armando.O</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Eacz12|<font color="#666">talk</font>]]|[[Special:Contributions/Eacz12|<font color="#666">contribs</font>]])</sup> 20:25, 22 January 2007 (PST) | |||
:::I think Wikipedia or whoever elses rules besides Dhamma's don't apply here. Relax. --[[User:XERXES II|XERXES_II]] 7:49, 23 January 2007 (PST) | |||
I was just a suggestion for Dhamma, not for you. [[User:Eacz12|<font color="#666">Armando.O</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Eacz12|<font color="#666">talk</font>]]|[[Special:Contributions/Eacz12|<font color="#666">contribs</font>]])</sup> 11:21, 23 January 2007 (PST) | |||
::::Ahh - I just like a clean talk page. Mostly so I will be able to keep things straight as to what needs answering. --[[User:DhammaSeeker|DhammaSeeker]] 19:24, 23 January 2007 (PST) |
Revision as of 07:36, 25 January 2007
XERXES II Edits
I've finished going through all of the articles. I did my best to correct spelling, punctuation, grammar, line spacing, awkward phrasing, dead links, images on the left and without captions, incorrect or incomplete quotations, and needed citations.
The only thing I am uncertain about is what I did with the Live in Cologne page. The old links were dead. I replaced them with the complete concert, which I would defer to you to determine if that is allowable. --XERXES II 19:32, 3 December 2006 (PST)
EvReference logo...
Hi, I don't know if the EvReference logo can be changed to another...I've created one and I'll show you if u want. Armando 16:16, 16 December 2006 (PST)
- Sent you an email basically saying send it to me by email and we'll see what it looks like. --DhammaSeeker 12:24, 17 December 2006 (PST)
- Ok, I've sent you the pics. Armando 14:31, 17 December 2006 (PST)
- I used the large graphic for the main entry graphic on http://evanescencereference.info Thanks! I think I'm going to keep the smaller one as is for now. --DhammaSeeker 14:03, 18 December 2006 (PST)
On a related note, please add the logo (current or proposed) as a favicon in the address bar if possible. --XERXES_II 15:27, 17 December 2006 (PST)
- I think that it can't be changed for the pages that use MediaWiki..or yes?? Armando 15:35, 17 December 2006 (PST)
- I uploaded a favicon - the encircled 'E' form the Evanescent font. --DhammaSeeker 14:03, 18 December 2006 (PST)
- Hi DhammaSeeker, what about the logos? Armando 19:45, 18 December 2006 (PST)
- I used the large graphic for the main entry graphic on http://evanescencereference.info Thanks! I think I'm going to keep the smaller one as is for now. --DhammaSeeker 14:03, 18 December 2006 (PST)
- Cool! Armando 05:43, 19 December 2006 (PST)
C Sharp
I'm nominating the page Forever Gone, Forever You for movement back to the page Forever You. I wonder, why it was changed??? (Gyakusetsu 1/3/2006 24:35 MST)
- I originally moved it because the predominant opinion that I read around the Internet was that the title is "Forever Gone, Forever You." I just noticed (d'oh) in the history of the article that DhammaSeeker has it on better authority as "Forever You." I took care of it. --XERXES II 9:07, 4 January 2007 (PST)
Article for deletion
The article Evanescenceturkey should be deleted, becuase it has nothing to do here. It's not an official Evanescence website and the content of it (the article) is subjetive.
"The Best Evanescence website" ???? Armando 19:15, 13 January 2007 (PST)
- Agreed. Article deleted. --DhammaSeeker 08:59, 14 January 2007 (PST)
References
Hi,..are the References enabled?? Armando.O (talk|contribs) 08:46, 16 January 2007 (PST)
- I'm a mediawiki n00b. Can you please link to a page describing them or explaining how to enable then and I'll happily do that if it's not a security risk. --DhammaSeeker 14:54, 16 January 2007 (PST)
- I know how to use references/citations and I could copy the citing templates from Wikipedia, but I don't know how to enable those cuz I've never had a wiki :S Here's the Wikipedia page of the references. Wikipedia:References Armando.O (talk|contribs) 15:37, 16 January 2007 (PST)
Hey Armando - This is a test.[1] Is this what you were asking about? --DhammaSeeker 10:28, 18 January 2007 (PST)
- Yeah..It's excellent. Please, delete this Template:Cite web, because it doesn't work in this wiki...I dunno why :S.Armando.O (talk|contribs) 11:48, 19 January 2007 (PST)
- Done! --DhammaSeeker 12:15, 19 January 2007 (PST)
- ↑ This is a footnote test.
re: Archive
A little thing...Your archived discussion was too small to be archived. Armando.O (talk|contribs) 17:58, 20 January 2007 (PST)
- I'm going to sound stupid here, but what? --DhammaSeeker 11:41, 22 January 2007 (PST)
I mean, your talk page must have like 20 topics or be very long. (30-50 kbs) Armando.O (talk|contribs) 20:25, 22 January 2007 (PST)
- I think Wikipedia or whoever elses rules besides Dhamma's don't apply here. Relax. --XERXES_II 7:49, 23 January 2007 (PST)
I was just a suggestion for Dhamma, not for you. Armando.O (talk|contribs) 11:21, 23 January 2007 (PST)
- Ahh - I just like a clean talk page. Mostly so I will be able to keep things straight as to what needs answering. --DhammaSeeker 19:24, 23 January 2007 (PST)