Difference between revisions of "User talk:DhammaSeeker"

From The Evanescence Reference
Jump to: navigation, search
(re: Automata Magazine)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Archive ==
+
== re: Automata Magazine ==
 
 
A little thing...Your archived discussion was too small to be archived. [[User:Eacz12|<font color="#666">Armando.O</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Eacz12|<font color="#666">talk</font>]]|[[Special:Contributions/Eacz12|<font color="#666">contribs</font>]])</sup> 17:58, 20 January 2007 (PST)
 
 
 
:I'm going to sound stupid here, but what? --[[User:DhammaSeeker|DhammaSeeker]] 11:41, 22 January 2007 (PST)
 
 
 
I mean, your talk page must have like 20 topics or be very long. (30-50 kbs) [[User:Eacz12|<font color="#666">Armando.O</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Eacz12|<font color="#666">talk</font>]]|[[Special:Contributions/Eacz12|<font color="#666">contribs</font>]])</sup> 20:25, 22 January 2007 (PST)
 
 
 
:::I think Wikipedia or whoever elses rules besides Dhamma's don't apply here.  Relax. --[[User:XERXES II|XERXES_II]] 7:49, 23 January 2007 (PST)
 
 
 
I was just a suggestion for Dhamma, not for you. [[User:Eacz12|<font color="#666">Armando.O</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Eacz12|<font color="#666">talk</font>]]|[[Special:Contributions/Eacz12|<font color="#666">contribs</font>]])</sup> 11:21, 23 January 2007 (PST)
 
 
 
::::Ahh - I just like a clean talk page. Mostly so I will be able to keep things straight as to what needs answering. --[[User:DhammaSeeker|DhammaSeeker]] 19:24, 23 January 2007 (PST)
 
 
   
 
   
 
Hey, There are two versions of an article about issue 3.0 of Automata Magazine.  The more recent one [[Automata Magazine]] is more descriptive and accurate (i know because i own a copy of the magazine) so could you please delete this inaccurate old one [[Automata Version 3.0]] --[[User:Never be good enough|Never Be Good Enough]]
 
Hey, There are two versions of an article about issue 3.0 of Automata Magazine.  The more recent one [[Automata Magazine]] is more descriptive and accurate (i know because i own a copy of the magazine) so could you please delete this inaccurate old one [[Automata Version 3.0]] --[[User:Never be good enough|Never Be Good Enough]]
  
 +
:All done! --[[User:DhammaSeeker|DhammaSeeker]] 07:50, 25 January 2007 (PST)
 
----
 
----
 
*[[User_talk:DhammaSeeker/Archive | Archived Discussions]]
 
*[[User_talk:DhammaSeeker/Archive | Archived Discussions]]

Revision as of 07:50, 25 January 2007

re: Automata Magazine

Hey, There are two versions of an article about issue 3.0 of Automata Magazine. The more recent one Automata Magazine is more descriptive and accurate (i know because i own a copy of the magazine) so could you please delete this inaccurate old one Automata Version 3.0 --Never Be Good Enough

All done! --DhammaSeeker 07:50, 25 January 2007 (PST)