Difference between revisions of "The Evanescence Reference talk:Community Portal"

From The Evanescence Reference
Jump to: navigation, search
(suggestion)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
There's a lot of good stuff here, but if we really want to be an "authorative reference" rather than just another fanpage, perhaps we should cite more sources. I mean, "Amy says" may be enough for some, but if we could say things like "Amy says in (wherever, whenever)" it would make us more of an authoritive reference. --[[User:Teddywithfangs|Teddywithfangs]] 14:24, 22 December 2006 (PST)
 +
 
== Categories ==
 
== Categories ==
 
Q: Have you considered the creation of categories like songs, people, fan sites?
 
Q: Have you considered the creation of categories like songs, people, fan sites?
Line 18: Line 20:
 
[[User:Eacz12|Armando]] 09:05, 16 December 2006 (PST)
 
[[User:Eacz12|Armando]] 09:05, 16 December 2006 (PST)
  
 +
== Contributing Communities ==
  
----
+
Looking over the history of the Contributing Communities section, it appears there have been attempts to arrange the links according to individual favoritism. I have alphabetized the links by website name.  ''Who'' contributed is unimportant; only ''what'' is contributed matters. [[User:XERXES II|XERXES_II]] 12:00, 31 December 2006 (PST)
There's a lot of good stuff here, but if we really want to be an "authorative reference" rather than just another fanpage, perhaps we should cite more sources. I mean, "Amy says" may be enough for some, but if we could say things like "Amy says in (wherever, whenever)" it would make us more of an authoritive reference. --[[User:Teddywithfangs|Teddywithfangs]] 14:24, 22 December 2006 (PST)
 

Revision as of 13:00, 31 December 2006

There's a lot of good stuff here, but if we really want to be an "authorative reference" rather than just another fanpage, perhaps we should cite more sources. I mean, "Amy says" may be enough for some, but if we could say things like "Amy says in (wherever, whenever)" it would make us more of an authoritive reference. --Teddywithfangs 14:24, 22 December 2006 (PST)

Categories

Q: Have you considered the creation of categories like songs, people, fan sites?

A: Well, every song has its own page, and every person affiliated with Evanescence (past or present) has their own page. Perhaps I'm not understanding the question? As for Fan Sites, I just made a new page. List away! --DhammaSeeker 09:46, 6 August 2006 (PDT)

Q2: When I asked for Categories... I ask for the MediaWiki Feature Categories, that allows you organize the pages in a better way, where as I know, MediaWiki automatically generates a list of what pages are in the category XYZ, and you don't need to modify the Category page each time you add a page to it. I see you created the Songs pages which could work anyway. --J Aroche 01:26, 9 August 2006 (GMT -6:00)


I have created (and I will) a few categories and I'm gonna organize every article. Some of the categories I've created are these: Category:Band members, Category:Discography. (You can find another at the bottom of the articles. Inside this categories you can find another categories, for example..

I've created two templates...Template:Evanescence and Template:Songs.

Armando 09:05, 16 December 2006 (PST)

Contributing Communities

Looking over the history of the Contributing Communities section, it appears there have been attempts to arrange the links according to individual favoritism. I have alphabetized the links by website name. Who contributed is unimportant; only what is contributed matters. XERXES_II 12:00, 31 December 2006 (PST)