Jump to: navigation, search


1,358 bytes added, 14:07, 1 October 2016
2 IFPI codes for the only press?
Nowhere in the Origin article is there proof of the only official version having to contain 2 IFPI codes, as I remember you wrote the whole article. All 2 IFPI's mean is that it was replicated
at a later time from the original master.--[[User:The Master|The Master]] ([[User talk:The Master|talk]]) 10:14, 29 September 2016 (PDT)
It means whatever you think it means, The Master.
I'm done talking to you and going around in circles forever and ever. You're stubborn and avid to legitimize your own CD just in order to be able to sell it on eBay and get rid of your fake Origin.
This is the end of the talk.
Prove your point BEFORE you edit this page or do us all a favor and give up trying to change things around here. Go to Discogs, which is a no-man's-land and edit whatever you want to edit over there (like you've done already). Just beware they have rules too.
And HOPEFULLY, you'll fool some incautious buyer and trick him/her to buy your copy for a legitimate one and all this nonsense of "other releases", "pre-releases", "alternate releases" and so on will be over. If you publicly tell people how much money you want for your bootlegged Origin, maybe I can crowdfund raise it all just to have all this crazy talk done for real... Is that what you want? Just change things around here to sell your bootleg for a real deal just because you bought it so?
Believe whatever you want to believe, but I'm done having to draw things up so you can understand them. Wanna be a skeptical person and doubt the whole world? Fine... but away from this article.
Have a nice weekend. :-) --[[User:Marcinho|Marcinho]] ([[User talk:Marcinho|talk]]) 14:07, 1 October 2016 (PDT)

Navigation menu